Wagering Tips: The Pick 3
Handicapping the 1999 Breeders Cup
BRIS
has announced the availability of archived ALL-Ways software race
card datafiles and corresponding Exotic Results Datafiles for all
tracks BRIS covers. These datafiles date all the way back into
1998. So, now it is possible for ALL-Ways software handicappers
to rapidly build ALL-Ways Race Databases for the tracks they want
to play. There is a charge for this service. Check with the BRIS
or Frandsen Publishing Web site for details.
Version
8.0 of ALL-Ways software will be available in December 1999.
Watch the BRIS and Frandsen Publishing Web sites for details.
Notices will be mailed to Professional Edition users.
This
issue of the ALL-Ways Newsletter is devoted primarily to two
subjects, specifically, playing the Pick 3 and the 1999 Breeders
Cup. We lead off with the Pick 3. As you read the Pick 3 article,
keep in mind that the race card for Breeders Cup day at
Gulfstream Park includes eight Pick 3 wagering opportunities.
Playing the Pick 3
Pick
up just about any book or essay on the subject of wagering on
horse races and chances are pretty high the author will tell you
the Pick 3 is a great wager. We feel the same way. It is indeed a
great wager ... if it is played properly. There are some
realities about playing the Pick 3 that the general public just
does not understand. This is, of course, good news for the
serious player. This gives us the opportunity to craft our Pick 3
wagers to take advantage of these realities, giving us a
significant edge over the public. In this article, we will
briefly cover the reasons why the Pick 3 is a good wager, we will
expose the realities missed by the public and then we will show
you the very best way we know to play the Pick 3.
Why
the Pick 3 is a Good Wager
In
our July 1998 Newsletter, we explained, in some detail, why the
Daily Double is such a good wager. Well, all the same reasons
apply to the Pick 3. So, we will be brief. (If you contact us, we
will be pleased to send you back issues of our Newsletters.) The
Pick 3 is, far more often than not, a solid overlay wagering
opportunity because it generally pays a good deal more than a
straight three-race win Parlay (making a win bet in each race and
letting your payoffs ride). This is because the track takeout and
breakage apply just once to the Pick 3 wager as
opposed to three times, once for each race making up the Pick 3.
Another reason the Pick 3 is so good is because the public simply
misplays the wager. The public tends to play a 3 x 3 x 3 criss-cross
and they tend to wager too much on legitimate favorites. As you
will see, this is a blueprint for failure.
Another
reason we like this wager so much is because there are so many
opportunities to play it. The rolling Pick 3 that started in
California is now being picked up by many tracks across the
country. This means there are often six to eight Pick 3 wagering
opportunities on a single race card. Even if your home track does
not yet offer the rolling Pick 3, you can still play the wager
via simulcasts. And ALL-Ways software gives you all the
information you need to play simulcast races as well as you play
races at your home track.
Realities
About the Pick 3
We
promise that before the end of this article, we will show you a
way to play the Pick 3 that really works. But, to understand this
method, you must first understand the realities of the wager.
Reality
#1: You will not win this wager as often as you think or as often
as you would like.
For
individual races, if you are allowed to bet on legitimate
favorites, and if you bet one horse to win, you will probably
achieve around 35 percent winners. If you play two horses, this
should go up to 55 to 60 percent. Playing three horses to win
should get you up to the range of 65 to 70 percent. However,
we will make the point later that you should avoid playing
legitimate favorites as much as possible when playing the Pick 3.
This will cause your win percentages to go down to something like
those shown below.
Bet on 1 horse
30% wins
Bet on 2 horses
50% wins
Bet on 3 horses
60% wins
These
figures will, of course, vary by individual handicapper. But they
are within reason for our purposes.
Lets
see what these figures translate into in terms of how often you
would win a Pick 3 wager. To determine the percentage probability
of winning the Pick 3 , simply multiply the probabilities for
each race. For example, if you make a straight 1 x 1 x 1 wager (one
horse in each leg of the Pick 3), your probability of winning
would be 30% x 30% x 30%. This calculates to a 2.7% chance of
winning the bet. Note that even if you were to magically pick
winners at a 40% clip, a one horse per race wager would have you
winning the Pick 3 only 6.4% of the time. Here are some more
examples:
2
x 2 x 2 = 50% x 50% x 50% = 12.5% wins
2 x 3 x 3 = 50% x 60% x 60% = 18.0% wins
3 x 3 x 3 = 60% x 60% x 60% = 21.6% wins
Another way to state the same thing is that if you bet one horse per race you will win about 1 in 37 tries. Betting two horses in each race will yield 1 win in 8 tries and three horses in each race will yield a little better than 1 win in 5.
Reality
#2: You will need to play multiple horse combinations if you
expect to play the Pick 3 profitably.
If
you are going to play the Pick 3 successfully, you must be
prepared to spend some decent money on the wager and cover
multiple horse combinations. Personally, for a $2 Pick 3, we
believe you need to be prepared to spend at least $54 ($27 for a
$1 Pick 3). The discussion above on the probabilities of winning
builds a pretty good case by itself. But consider this as well.
If you win at a 20% clip which is about what you achieve with a 3
x 3 x 3 wager, statistically, your bankroll must be able to stand
a string of 20 consecutive losses. At a 12.5% clip,
statistically, you must be able to handle a string of 40
consecutive losses. The smaller your wager, the less chance you
have of winning and the more likely you are to tap out
your bankroll. If you are not comfortable with this size wager,
you are better off going partners with someone else and owning a
share of a larger ticket than to under bet this wager.
Reality
#3: You cannot profitably play the Pick 3 by betting on favorites.
For
a $2 Pick 3, a 3 x 3 x 3 wager will cost you $54 and you will win
it, on average, once every 4.6 wagers. So, to break even with
this wager, you need a payoff of 4.6 x $54 which is $250. For the
risk we take and the patience we must have with the Pick 3, we
are looking for at least a 50% premium. This means we must
receive an average payoff in the range of $375.
The
good news is that this kind of average payoff is readily
available with the Pick 3 provided, however, that favorites win
no more than one of the three races. In his excellent book Commonsense
Betting, Dick Mitchell presented a study of Pick 3 payoffs
at Santa Anita. Take a look at the chart below which shows
average payoffs at Santa Anita for $2 Pick 3s.
Number
Average
Average
of
All
Excluding
Favorites
Payoffs
Large
Winning
Payoffs
0
$1,768
$567
1 $641
$353
2 $119
$119
3 $31
$31
The
chart makes it clear that you must be very selective with the
Pick 3 opportunities you decide to play. You should be confident
that you understand each leg and that you have spotted non-
favorites with real chances of winning at least two of the legs.
This is not as difficult as it may seem. Remember, non- favorites
win about two thirds of all races.
Earlier,
we stated how much we like the rolling Pick 3 format because it
gives us six to eight Pick 3s on a race card. We like this
not because we actually will play all the Pick 3s, but
because we can be very selective and still get two or three plays
on a typical card.
The Best Way We Know to Play the Pick 3
As promised, we have reached the point where we will show you our recommended method for playing the Pick 3. First, here is a reminder. The crowd typically bets a 3 x 3 x 3 criss - cross. This costs $54 for a $2 wager and wins, on average, about 21.6% of the time.
First, we examine each leg of the Pick 3 to make sure there is a vulnerable favorite in at least two legs. Second, we identify one horse in each of the three races that we believe has the best chance of winning. This is our Key Horse and is designated below as the "A" horse. Then we purchase three separate tickets crafted as follows:
1) | A | ABC | ABC |
2) | ABC | A | ABC |
3) | ABC | ABC | A |
To win this wager, at least one of our Key Horses must win its race. Remember, the Key Horse must not be the favorite in more than one of the races. Preferably, the key horse will not be the favorite in any race. Each ticket, based on a $2 wager, costs $18 for a total wager of $54.
This set of tickets excludes the BC BC BC combinations. The odds of one of these combinations winning are only 2.7%. So, the probability of winning this wager is the same as the criss - cross wager less 2.7%. This makes the probability of winning this wager 18.9%.
Here is why this is such a good approach. The wager costs us the same as a 3 x 3 x 3 criss - cross ($54). Our probability of winning is 18.9%, just slightly less than the 21.6% probability for the 3 x 3 x 3 criss - cross. But, the 3 x 3 x 3 criss - cross can win the wager only once. In our case, we can actually win the wager once, twice and even three times depending on how many of the races are won by our Key Horse. Another way to look at it is that we have bet more money on the most likely winning combinations and less money on the least likely winning combinations. This is always a good way to wager. And, again because we will win the wager more than one time on many occasions, our break even payoff and premium payoff requirements are actually lower than the 3 X 3 x 3 criss - cross wager. In essence, we are giving up the 2.7% chance of winning the 3 x 3 x 3 criss - cross, which works out to 1 in every 37 wagers, in favor of gaining the opportunity to win the wager three times every time we make the wager.
There certainly are legitimate variations to this approach. For example, there may be times when you want to play four horses in a particular race or where you can limit your bet to 2 horses in a particular leg. These wagers might look something like this:
1) | A | ABC | ABCD |
2) | ABC | A | ABCD |
3) | ABC | ABC | A |
1) | A | AB | ABCD |
2) | ABC | A | ABCD |
3) | ABC | AB | A |
Notice that there are some constants here. There is a key horse in every race and you have the chance to win the Pick 3 three times.
Summary
1. Select Pick 3 sequences of races where you believe it is likely that favorites will not win at least two of the races.
2. Identify a Key Horse in each race. This is the horse that you believe has the best chance of winning. Remember, your Key Horse in at least two of the races must not be the favorite.
3. Pass the wager if you are not reasonably confident of your handicapping. You should feel like you have a real handle on what is likely to happen in all three races.
4. Create three separate Pick 3 tickets, one each with a Key Horse singled in each leg as we have illustrated earlier.
This really is a great wager. Why not give it a try at this years Breeders Cup?
A
day with the best horses, the best trainers, the best jockeys,
the biggest purses, races that lend themselves to good
handicapping, some really nice payoffs. Wow! It is Breeders
Cup time again. This years Breeders Cup will be run
on November 6th at Gulfstream Park in Florida. And the folks at
Gulfstream have put together an absolutely great three days of
racing beginning on Friday November 5th and ending on Sunday
after the Breeders Cup.
Some
Changes in 1999
With
the addition of the new Breeders Cup Filly and Mare Turf,
the Breeders Cup (BC) now consists of eight races as
opposed to just seven races in years past. The new race is for
fillies and mares 3 years and older at 1 3/8 miles on the turf.
The purse is $1 million. So, total purse money for the BC races
is now at $13 million.
The
day starts with two undercard races. Race #1 is the $100,000
Sunday Silence Stakes for 3 year olds and up at 1 1/16 miles on
the dirt. Race #2 is the $100,000 Eliza Stakes for 2 year old
fillies at 6 furlongs on the dirt. The actual order of the BC
races has changed too. Here is what the full card looks like for
BC day. Note that an Exacta and a Trifecta are offered for every
race. The other wagers are shown below.
1 The
Sunday Silence 2 The Eliza 3 BC Distaff 4 BC Juvenile Fillies 5 BC Mile 6 BC Sprint 7 BC Filly & Mare Turf 8 BC Juvenile 9 BC Turf 10 BC Classic |
P3, DD P3 P3 P3, DD P3, P6 P3, Super P3, Super P3, Super DD, Super Super |
There
are 3 Daily Doubles (DD), 8 Pick 3s (P3) and 5 Superfectas.
The Pick 6 starts with the BC Mile. Each BC race has a purse of $1
Million except for the $2 million BC Distaff, the $2 million BC
Turf and the $4 million BC Classic.
The
card on Friday, November 5th includes 10 races as does the card
on Sunday, November 7th. These 20 races plus the two undercard
races on Breeders Cup day have total purse money of $2,425,000.
Seems like good candidate for a wonderful 3 day weekend of
handicapping.
Analyzing
Gulfstream Park
Now
we are going to take a close look at Gulfstream Park.
We
will look at track bias statistics and then, using the Analysis
Module in ALL-Ways software, we will look at which of ALL-Ways
softwares 71 key handicapping factors have the
highest Impact Values (IVs). Remember, an IV of 1.0 means
that horses ranked first in a race for this factor win just their
fair share of races, no more and no less. An IV above 1.0
indicates horses ranked first win more than their fair share of
races. For example, an IV of 2.2 means that horses ranked first
win, on average, 2.2 times their fair share of races. An IV of 2.0
or higher is considered to be very strong.
The
Impact Value Analysis also shows us how profitable each factor
has been in terms of the return on each $2 bet. A return of $2.40
means that if we had bet $2.00 in every race on the horses ranked
first for the factor, we would have won $2.40 for each $2.00
wagered. This is an average profit of 40 cents for an
average return on investment of 20 percent.
The
Impact Value Analysis was restricted to just very high caliber
races run at Gulfstream. We had a very large database (over 2000
races), so we had plenty of races to analyze. Note that
this analysis can be applied to every race run at Gulfstream
during the entire three day Breeders Cup weekend.
Dirt
Sprints
Gulfstream
favors early runners in dirt sprints with about 70% of races won
by Early (E) and Early Presser (EP)
horses.Sustainer horses (S), the deep closers, have a
dismally low Impact Value of only 0.39. They are at a real
disadvantage at Gulfstream in dirt sprints.
Here
are the most powerful and the most profitable ALL-Ways
Handicapping Factors for high caliber dirt sprints run at
Gulfstream.
Factor | IV | ROI | ||
True Class | 2.15 | $2.62 | ||
Hall Speed Last | 1.85 | $2.06 | ||
First Call Position | 1.80 | $3.31 | ||
Hall Early Pace 2/3 | 1.77 | $2.69 | ||
Comprehensive | 2.65 | $2.20 |
*The
2/3 designation indicates this is an average for the
horses best 2 out of its last 3 races.
As
expected, horses do well in high caliber dirt sprints at
Gulfstream if they are on or near the lead at the First Call (the
2 furlong mark) and if they have a good Early Pace Rating which
is measured at the Second Call (the 4 furlong mark).
The
BC Sprint tends to produce lots of upsets and big payoffs. This
is due to the fact that The BC Sprint almost always has a
tremendous amount of early speed. The races have, in the past,
often set up for high priced closers. So, we also ran an Impact
Value Analysis that was restricted to only high caliber dirt
sprints with a Race Pace Shape of EEE. These are
races with three or more E horses. Look at these
running style bias figures.
E
EP P
S
1.57
0.68 0.43
0.40
The
results really surprised us. Normally, because of all the early
speed, we would expect to see Impact Values increase for P
and S horses. But, in this case, it did not happen.
What this tells us is that dirt sprint races at Gulfstream with a
lot of early speed favor the very best of the best E
horses. This is an important piece of information.
Dirt
Routes
Breeders
Cup dirt routes include the BC Juvenile at 1 1/16 mile, the BC
Juvenile Fillies at 1 1/16 mile, the BC Distaff at 1 1/8 mile and
the BC Classic at 1 1/4 mile. The two juvenile races and the
Distaff tend not to yield many surprises. The winners have been
very predictable resulting in modest payoffs. The BC Classic, on
the other hand, yields its share of high priced winners.
Here
are the Impact Values for the different running styles.
E
EP P
S
1.20
1.17 0.76
0.86
Here
are the most powerful and profitable ALL-Ways Handicapping
Factors.
Factor | IV | ROI | ||
Avg. Competitive Level | 2.97 | $2.39 | ||
BRIS Speed 2/3 | 2.53 | $2.18 | ||
Hall Early Pace 2/3 | 1.94 | $2.00 | ||
BRIS Combined 2/3* | 2.19 | $2.08 | ||
Comprehensive | 2.58 | $2.11 |
The
Combined Rating is a compound pace rating of Early Pace plus
Final Fraction Pace.
The
somewhat low ROI figures imply that high caliber dirt routes at
Gulfstream tend to run true to form and do not yield a lot of
surprises. We also found a very useful factor to help you
eliminate non-contenders. Horses that are not ranked 1st, 2nd or
3rd in the Comprehensive Rating have very low Impact Values of
0.37 to 0.46.
Turf
Routes
The
Breeders Cup turf races are the BC Mile at (surprise) one
mile, the BC Turf at 1 1/2 miles and the new BC Fillies and Mare
Turf at 1 3/8 miles.
Watch
out for horses shipping in from Europe for these races. Also, the
BC Turf tends to produce a lot of upsets and some very high
priced winners.
Here
comes another particularly important piece of information. As
you would expect, the running style bias for all turf routes at
Gulfstream shift to being slightly in favor of horses coming from
off the pace, particularly Presser (P) horses.
However, when we restrict the analysis to only high caliber
races, the advantage stays with E and EP
horses as shown below.
E
EP P
S
1.30
1.04 0.77
0.99
Here
are the best Handicapping Factors
Factor
IV ROI
Scott PCR
2.49 $2.67
Hall Speed Last
2.29 $2.57
First Call Position
2.10 $2.54
Hall Combined 2/3
2.36 $2.99
Brohamer SP
1.86 $2.33
Scott
PCR is William Scotts Performance Class Rating, a measure
of a horses competitive level. The Brohamer SP Rating measures
the horses Sustained Pace throughout the race but gives
slightly more weight to the horses early pace capability.
Some
BC Odds-N-Ends
If he has any horses entered in BC races, watch out for trainer
Andre Fabre horses coming in from Europe. They will most likely
run well.
In the BC Mile, watch out for Da Hoss. He will be lightly raced
again this year as he was last year when he won paying $25.20.
Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.
The European Time Form Ratings that BRIS will make available for
the Breeders Cup are a very useful handicapping tool,
particular for the three Breeders Cup turf races.
ALL-Ways software includes extensive Class Ratings for European
horses as well as North American runners.
Consider reading the Breeders Cup article in ALL-Ways
Newsletter #11 dated October 1998. There is quite a bit of detail
about each individual Breeders Cup race that may be helpful
for this years BC. Just contact us if you would
like us to send you a copy of any or all our past newsletters.
If you are not now an ALL-Ways software user, you may want to get
the software from BRIS just for the Breeders Cup. Without
learning all about the software, you can simply print out the All
Factors Report that shows, on a single page, side-by-side ratings
of every horse for all 71 Key Handicapping Factors.
Frandsen
Publishing will post special Breeders Cup ALL-Ways
Handicapping Profiles on our Web site. ALL-Ways software users
can download these profiles and use them to handicap all the
races run at Gulfstream for the 3-day Breeders Cup weekend.
We wish you a profitable and fun filled day on November 6th!
NEXT: ALL-Ways Newsletters
� Copyright 1999
Frandsen Publishing Corporation
PO Box 1439
Minnetonka, MN 55345
All Rights Reserved
How to reach
Frandsen Publishing
Phone: 612.937.9180
E-Mail: frandsen@mn.uswest.net
Web Site: www.frandsen.com